PM security breach: SC signals war of words, appoints investigation team leader

PM security breach: SC signals war of words, appoints investigation team leader

While both the The Center and the Punjab government had established separate investigative panels, the bank headed by the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana said that it is “of the weighted opinion that these issues cannot be left to be resolved through unilateral investigations” and that one is needed ” independent mind with judicial training “.

“Until the investigation committee proceedings are concluded …, the investigations ordered by the central government and the state government will be kept on hold,” said the court, which also includes judges Surya Kant and Hima Kohli.

In addition to Judge Indu Malhotra, the investigation panel will include the Director General of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) or his / her designee who is not below the rank of Inspector General of Police, Director General of Police, Union Territory of Chandigarh and Additional Director General of Police (Security), Punjab, as members and the Registrar General of Punjab and Haryana High Court as member and coordinator.

The court noted that while the fact of the security breach is not disputed, “there is, however, a blame game between the state and the central government over who is responsible for such failures.” Saying that the “war of words between them is not a solution”, the bank said that “it may rather affect the need for a robust mechanism to respond at such a critical time.”

The court agreed with the petitioner’s attorney, Senior Counsel Maninder Singh, that “not only is it possible for the officers / authorities responsible for the… lapse to be identified, but there is also a greater urgency to develop new measures that can ensure that there is no recurrence of such lapses in the future ”.

READ  Protesters clash with police in Jharkhand's Hazaribag, several injured | Ranchi News

The court said it is “of the weighted opinion that these issues cannot be left to be resolved through unilateral investigations.” “An independent mind with judicial training, duly assisted by officials who are well acquainted with security considerations and the Secretary General of the Superior Court who has seized the file pursuant to our previous order, would be better able to visit effectively all problems and present a comprehensive report for the consideration of this court, “he said.

While the court asked the committee to present its report as soon as possible, it did not specify a date.

The committee has been asked to investigate the “causes of the security breach”; “Who is responsible … and to what extent”; “What should be the corrective measures or safeguards necessary for the safety of the Honorable Prime Minister or other proteges”; “Suggestions or recommendations to improve the safety and protection of other constitutional officials”; “Any other incidental matter that the committee considers convenient and convenient.”

Explained |How is the prime minister’s security planned, and what exactly went wrong in Punjab?

Hearing a statement from the Delhi-based Lawyers Voice on January 7, the court requested the Secretary General of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to “immediately seize and secure the records” of the Prime Minister’s visit. The court was subsequently told that “the relevant records have been received, seized, secured” and “sealed and placed in the custody of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.”

On Wednesday, the court ordered that these records be turned over to the chairman of the investigation panel within three days. He also instructed the Center and the Punjab government “to provide full assistance to the investigation committee to complete the assigned task.”

READ  Probable XI, game prediction, weather forecast and field report

During the January 10 hearing, the Center had urged the court to allow its committee to continue its investigation and present a report to the court. But this was opposed by the Punjab government, which said it “had no hope” in the Center committee and urged the court to form an “independent committee”. The court reserved its order, making it clear that it would appoint a panel headed by a former Supreme Court judge to investigate the matter.

On January 5, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s convoy was stranded on an overpass for 15-20 minutes due to a blockade by protesters in Ferozepur.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Venezuela en fútbol